BOOK AN APPOINTMENT
BOOK AN APPOINTMENT

Gallstones vs Gallbladder Polyps: Key Differences, Risks and Treatment

October 23, 2026

At a glance 

OverviewDetails
Conditions CoveredGallstones and gallbladder polyps
Main DifferenceGallstones are solid deposits that form within bile, while gallbladder polyps are growths arising from the gallbladder wall
How They Are FoundBoth are commonly detected on abdominal ultrasound, sometimes incidentally
SymptomsGallstones are more likely to cause biliary pain and complications; gallbladder polyps are usually asymptomatic
Main Health ConcernGallstones may cause inflammation, bile duct blockage or pancreatitis, while gallbladder polyps are assessed mainly for features associated with malignancy risk
Role of SizeStone size alone usually does not determine treatment; polyp size is an important factor in deciding whether surveillance or surgery is needed
AssessmentUltrasound is usually the first-line investigation, with attention to mobility, acoustic shadowing, size, morphology and gallbladder wall features
Treatment ApproachAsymptomatic gallstones often require no treatment, while symptomatic or complicated stones may require surgery; polyps may be observed, monitored or removed depending on size and risk features
SurgeryCholecystectomy removes the entire gallbladder and may be recommended for symptomatic gallstones or gallbladder polyps that meet criteria for surgical management
When to Seek Medical AdviceSevere or persistent upper abdominal pain, fever, jaundice, persistent vomiting or worsening symptoms should be medically assessed
Gallstones vs Gallbladder Polyps Singapore
Gallstones are solid deposits that form within bile, while gallbladder polyps are growths that arise from and remain attached to the gallbladder wall. 

An abdominal ultrasound may reveal an unexpected abnormality in the gallbladder, even when the scan was performed for an entirely different reason. When the report identifies a gallstone or gallbladder polyp, it is important to understand that these findings arise differently and are assessed for different reasons. Their presence alone does not necessarily indicate a serious condition or mean that treatment is required.

Gallstones are solid deposits that develop from components of bile within the gallbladder, whereas gallbladder polyps are projections arising from its inner lining. Many gallstones remain completely asymptomatic, and most gallbladder polyps detected on ultrasound are benign. However, gallstones can become clinically important when they cause pain, obstruction or inflammation, while the significance of a polyp depends largely on characteristics such as its size, appearance, growth and associated risk factors.

In this blog, we explain the differences between gallstones and gallbladder polyps, the symptoms and complications they may cause, how they are assessed on imaging and the factors that determine whether monitoring or treatment may be needed.

Two Different Findings Inside the Gallbladder

The gallbladder is a small organ located beneath the liver. It stores and concentrates bile, a digestive fluid produced by the liver that helps with the digestion and absorption of fats. Gallstones and gallbladder polyps can both be identified during an ultrasound examination of this organ, but they originate in different places.

A gallstone develops within bile when certain substances crystallise and gradually form solid material [1]. The resulting stone lies within the cavity of the gallbladder and is usually able to move when the patient’s position changes.

A gallbladder polyp originates from the gallbladder wall [2]. It projects from the lining into the cavity of the gallbladder and generally remains attached to the wall.

Both can be incidental findings, discovered during imaging performed for another medical reason. This does not mean that either should be ignored, but it also does not mean that every gallstone or polyp requires treatment. The significance of the finding depends on its characteristics, the patient's symptoms and the risk of future complications.

Understanding Gallstones and Why They Form

Bile contains cholesterol, bile salts, bilirubin and other substances. Gallstones develop when conditions within the bile favour crystallisation and the gradual formation of solid deposits. Cholesterol stones are the most common type in many populations, while pigment stones, which contain bilirubin-related material, form through different mechanisms.

Gallstones vary considerably in size and number. Some people have a single stone, while others develop multiple stones [3]. Importantly, many gallstones never cause symptoms and are discovered incidentally.

Several factors are associated with an increased likelihood of gallstone formation, including:

  • increasing age
  • female sex
  • obesity
  • pregnancy
  • rapid weight loss
  • certain blood, metabolic and gastrointestinal conditions
  • some medications

The presence of gallstones becomes particularly important when they interfere with the normal flow of bile. A stone obstructing the outlet of the gallbladder can produce biliary pain, while persistent obstruction can lead to inflammation of the gallbladder [4]. Stones that enter the bile ducts can cause further complications, including bile duct obstruction, infection or pancreatitis.

For this reason, doctors do not determine treatment simply by asking whether stones are present. Whether they are causing symptoms or complications is usually much more important.

Gallstones Singapore
Gallstones are hardened deposits that form from components of bile within the gallbladder and can vary in size and number.

 

Understanding Gallbladder Polyps

Gallbladder polyps require a different type of assessment because they arise from the gallbladder wall instead of forming within bile. They appear on imaging as projections extending from the inner surface of the gallbladder into its cavity.

Importantly, most gallbladder polyps detected on ultrasound are benign [5]. Many are cholesterol polyps, sometimes called pseudopolyps, which are related to cholesterol deposits within the gallbladder wall. Other benign lesions include inflammatory polyps, while true neoplastic polyps such as adenomas are less common.

The reason polyps are assessed carefully is that some neoplastic lesions, including gallbladder cancer, can have a polypoid appearance. A diagnosis of a gallbladder polyp, therefore, does not mean that cancer is present. Instead, the purpose of assessment is to identify the relatively small group of lesions with features that warrant closer surveillance, further investigation or surgery.

Doctors may consider factors such as:

  • polyp size
  • shape and appearance on ultrasound
  • growth on subsequent imaging
  • associated changes in the gallbladder wall
  • relevant individual risk factors

Most gallbladder polyps are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally. Depending on their characteristics and the patient's risk profile, management can range from no further follow-up to repeat ultrasound surveillance or consideration of gallbladder removal.

Gallbladder Polyp Singapore
A gallbladder polyp is a growth or projection that arises from the inner lining of the gallbladder and extends into its cavity.

Gallstones vs Gallbladder Polyps: Key Differences

The distinction between gallstones and gallbladder polyps becomes particularly clear on ultrasound. Stones usually lie freely within the gallbladder and move with changes in body position, whereas polyps remain attached to the gallbladder wall. Their clinical significance is also assessed differently.

FeatureGallstonesGallbladder Polyps
OriginForm from the components of bileArise from the gallbladder wall
PositionLie within the gallbladder cavityProject from and remain attached to the gallbladder wall
Movement on UltrasoundUsually move when the patient's position changesUsually remain fixed to the wall
Acoustic ShadowingTypically produce posterior acoustic shadowingTypically do not produce posterior acoustic shadowing
SymptomsOften asymptomatic but can cause biliary pain and complicationsUsually asymptomatic
Main Clinical ConcernSymptoms and stone-related complicationsSize, growth, morphology and features associated with malignancy risk
MonitoringRoutine surveillance is generally unnecessary for uncomplicated asymptomatic gallstonesSelected polyps may require follow-up ultrasound
SurgeryUsually considered when stones cause symptoms or complicationsMay be considered for polyps with characteristics that warrant removal

When Gallstones Begin to Affect Your Health

Many gallstones remain silent, meaning they cause no symptoms and may never create a health problem. They are often discovered incidentally during an ultrasound or another abdominal investigation. The situation changes when a stone interferes with the normal drainage of bile.

A common presentation is biliary colic, which occurs when a gallstone temporarily obstructs the outlet of the gallbladder. This typically causes steady pain in the upper abdomen, often towards the right side or centre. The pain may become intense and can last from around 30 minutes to several hours before settling as the obstruction resolves.

More persistent obstruction or movement of stones into the bile ducts can lead to complications, including:

This distinction is important when considering treatment. Having gallstones is not the same as having symptomatic gallstone disease. An incidental stone that has never caused symptoms is approached differently from gallstones causing recurrent pain, inflammation or other complications.

Why the Size and Appearance of a Gallbladder Polyp Matter

With gallbladder polyps, doctors are usually less concerned with symptoms alone and more interested in what the lesion looks like and whether it has features associated with a greater likelihood of neoplasia or malignancy.

One of the most important characteristics is polyp size. Larger polyps warrant greater attention, and a size of around 10 mm has traditionally been an important threshold at which cholecystectomy may be considered or recommended in several clinical guidelines [10]. However, size should not be interpreted in isolation, and recommendations differ between guidelines, particularly for polyps below this threshold.

Assessment may also take into account:

  • whether the polyp has increased in size on follow-up imaging
  • whether it has a sessile appearance, meaning it has a broad base instead of being attached by a narrow stalk
  • associated focal gallbladder wall thickening
  • other imaging characteristics that make the nature of the lesion uncertain
  • individual factors associated with a higher risk of malignancy
  • symptoms potentially attributable to the gallbladder after other causes have been considered

This is why two patients with gallbladder polyps may receive different recommendations even when neither has symptoms. A small polyp with reassuring features may require little or no surveillance, while a larger, growing or otherwise concerning lesion may warrant closer investigation or consideration of gallbladder removal.

How Gallstones and Gallbladder Polyps Are Assessed

Abdominal ultrasound is usually the primary imaging test for suspected gallstones and gallbladder polyps. It allows the gallbladder, its contents and its wall to be examined without radiation and can often distinguish between the two findings.

Gallstones typically appear as bright, echogenic structures within the gallbladder. They usually move when the patient’s position changes and commonly produce posterior acoustic shadowing, where the stone blocks the ultrasound beam and creates a shadow behind it. Ultrasound can also identify findings that may accompany acute gallbladder inflammation, such as wall thickening or fluid around the gallbladder.

Gallbladder polyps behave differently on ultrasound. They:

  • arise from and remain attached to the gallbladder wall
  • typically do not move when the patient's position changes
  • generally do not produce posterior acoustic shadowing
  • are assessed according to their size, shape and relationship with the gallbladder wall

Accurate measurement is particularly important for polyps because size can influence decisions about surveillance and surgery.

Sometimes an ultrasound cannot confidently determine the nature of a gallbladder lesion. In selected cases, additional or more specialised imaging may be considered to clarify an uncertain finding or provide further characterisation before management is decided.

Monitoring Versus Treatment

Not every gallstone or gallbladder polyp requires treatment simply because it has been detected. The appropriate approach depends on the type of finding, whether it is causing symptoms, its imaging characteristics and the likelihood of future complications.

For gallstones, symptoms are an important part of the decision. Gallstones discovered incidentally in someone who has never experienced biliary symptoms can often be managed without surgery. Once stones begin causing recurrent pain or complications, however, treatment becomes more likely to be recommended.

Management of gallstones may therefore include:

  • Observation for asymptomatic gallstones in most patients
  • Cholecystectomy for recurrent or troublesome gallstone symptoms
  • More urgent assessment and treatment when complications such as acute cholecystitis, bile duct obstruction, cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis occur
  • Additional procedures, such as endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones, when stones have migrated outside the gallbladder

For gallbladder polyps, management is guided less by symptoms alone and more by the characteristics of the lesion. The size and morphology of the polyp, changes seen on follow-up imaging and relevant patient-specific risk factors all help determine whether observation or surgery is appropriate.

Depending on these findings, management may involve:

  • No further follow-up for some small polyps with reassuring features
  • Ultrasound surveillance for selected polyps to monitor their size and appearance over time
  • Further assessment when imaging is inconclusive or the lesion has concerning characteristics
  • Cholecystectomy when the size, growth, morphology or overall risk profile makes surgical removal appropriate

The important distinction is that gallstones are generally treated because of the symptoms or complications they cause, while gallbladder polyps are managed primarily according to their characteristics and potential clinical risk. In both cases, the decision should be individualised instead of being based on the ultrasound finding alone.

When Gallbladder Removal May Be Recommended

Although gallstones and gallbladder polyps are different conditions, both may be treated with cholecystectomy when there is a clear clinical reason to remove the gallbladder.

Gallbladder removal may be recommended for:

  • Recurrent symptomatic gallstones causing episodes of biliary pain [11]
  • Acute or recurrent cholecystitis caused by gallstones
  • Gallstone-related complications, such as bile duct stones or gallstone pancreatitis
  • Gallbladder polyps with concerning characteristics, including size, growth or morphology associated with a higher risk of malignancy [12]
  • Selected symptomatic gallbladder polyps, where symptoms are considered likely to originate from the gallbladder and other causes have been appropriately assessed

Cholecystectomy removes the entire gallbladder together with the stones or polyp, instead of removing the individual finding alone. When surgery is appropriate, a laparoscopic approach is generally preferred where it can be performed safely.

Symptoms That Should Prompt Medical Attention

An incidental gallstone or gallbladder polyp may cause no immediate problems. However, certain symptoms should not be ignored, particularly because they may indicate gallstone obstruction, inflammation or infection.

Seek prompt medical assessment if you develop:

  • severe or persistent upper abdominal pain
  • abdominal pain accompanied by fever or chills
  • yellowing of the skin or eyes (jaundice)
  • persistent vomiting
  • marked abdominal tenderness
  • abdominal symptoms accompanied by feeling significantly unwell

These symptoms can occur with complications such as acute cholecystitis, bile duct obstruction, cholangitis or pancreatitis and may require urgent assessment. An incidental gallbladder polyp alone would not usually be expected to cause an acute episode of severe illness, so other biliary or abdominal causes need to be considered.

Key Takeaway

Gallstones and gallbladder polyps may both be identified during an ultrasound, but the similarity largely ends there. Gallstones form within bile and become clinically important mainly when they cause symptoms, obstruction or complications. Gallbladder polyps arise from the gallbladder wall and are assessed principally according to their size, morphology, growth and other features that help determine their level of risk.

Neither finding automatically means that surgery is necessary. Many people with asymptomatic gallstones require no treatment, while many small gallbladder polyps can be managed conservatively, depending on their characteristics and individual risk factors. An ultrasound result, therefore, needs to be considered alongside your symptoms, medical history, previous imaging and the specific features reported on the scan.

If an ultrasound has identified gallstones or a gallbladder polyp and you are unsure what the finding means for your health, consider scheduling a consultation with a specialist at Tan Siong San Surgery for an individual assessment and discussion of the appropriate next steps.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

Can you have gallstones and gallbladder polyps at the same time?

Yes. Gallstones and gallbladder polyps are different conditions and can occur in the same gallbladder. If both are present, management will depend on symptoms, imaging findings and the characteristics of the polyp.

Can an ultrasound mistake a gallbladder polyp for a gallstone?

Ultrasound can usually distinguish between them because gallstones typically move and produce acoustic shadowing, while polyps remain attached to the gallbladder wall. However, some findings can be difficult to characterise, and repeat or additional imaging may occasionally be needed.

Can a gallbladder polyp disappear on a follow-up scan?

Yes, a previously reported small polyp may no longer be visible on subsequent ultrasound. This may reflect resolution of a pseudopolyp or differences in imaging and measurement, and further follow-up will depend on the clinical context.

Do gallbladder polyps turn into cancer?

Most gallbladder polyps are benign and do not become cancerous. However, some true neoplastic polyps can have malignant potential, which is why size, morphology, growth and individual risk factors are considered when deciding on surveillance or surgery.

Can gallstones disappear without treatment?

Established gallstones generally do not simply disappear on their own, although their appearance and detection can vary between scans. Asymptomatic gallstones often do not need to be removed simply because they are present.

How quickly can gallbladder polyps grow?

Growth rates vary, and small changes in measured size can also occur because of differences between ultrasound examinations. Doctors therefore interpret growth alongside the polyp's overall size, morphology, previous imaging and individual risk factors.

What happens to a gallbladder polyp after the gallbladder is removed?

During a cholecystectomy, the entire gallbladder containing the polyp is removed. The specimen is then typically sent for histopathological examination, which allows the tissue to be examined under a microscope and the nature of the lesion to be confirmed.

Can gallstones or polyps return after cholecystectomy?

Once the gallbladder has been completely removed, gallbladder stones and gallbladder polyps cannot recur within it. Stones can, however, occasionally remain or develop within the bile ducts after cholecystectomy.

References

  1. Jones, M. W., Weir, C. B., & Marietta, M. (2026). Gallstones(Cholelithiasis). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459370/ 
  2. Andrén-Sandberg, Å. (2012). Diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(5), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.95897 
  3. Definition & facts for gallstones—Niddk. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Retrieved August 27, 2026, from https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/digestive-diseases/gallstones/definition-facts 
  4. Gallbladder Dysfunction: Cholecystitis, Choledocholithiasis, Cholangitis, and Biliary Dyskinesia. Pubmed. Ncbi. Nlm. Nih. Gov. Retrieved August 27, 2026, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29132521/ 
  5. Cocco, G., Basilico, R., Delli Pizzi, A., Cocco, N., Boccatonda, A., D’Ardes, D., Fabiani, S., Anzoletti, N., D’Alessandro, P., Vallone, G., Cipollone, F., & Schiavone, C. (2021). Gallbladder polyps ultrasound: What the sonographer needs to know. Journal of Ultrasound, 24(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-021-00563-1 
  6. Jones, M. W., Santos, G., Patel, P. J., & O’Rourke, M. C. (2026). Acute cholecystitis. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459171/ 
  7. McNicoll, C. F., Pastorino, A., Farooq, U., Froehlich, M. J., & St Hill, C. R. (2026). Choledocholithiasis. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441961/ 
  8. Virgile, J., & Marathi, R. (2026). Cholangitis. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558946/ 
  9. Isogai, M. (2024). Pathophysiology of severe gallstone pancreatitis: A new paradigm. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 30(7), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i7.614 
  10. Gurusamy, K. S., Abu‐Amara, M., Farouk, M., & Davidson, B. R. (2009). Cholecystectomy for gallbladder polyp. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009(1), CD007052. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007052.pub2  
  11. Shabanzadeh, D. M. (2023). The symptomatic outcomes of cholecystectomy for gallstones. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(5), 1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051897 
  12. Van Dooren, M., De Savornin Lohman, E. A. J., Van Der Bilt, J., De Boer, M. T., Boerma, D., Bos, P., Braat, A. E., De Castro, S. M. M., Corten, B. J. G. A., Daams, F., Erdmann, J. I., Ferenschild, F., Fortuin, A. S., Van Geloven, N., Van Der Hoeven, E., Klicks, R., Kruyt, F. M., Langenhoff, B. S., Liem, M. S. L., … De Reuver, P. (2025). Revised guidelines for the treatment and follow‐up of gallbladder polyps do not reduce unwarranted cholecystectomies: Results of the polyp study. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 13(7), 1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70057 

Dr. Tan Siong San

Adjunct Assistant Prof (Duke-NUS)
MBBS (NUS)
MRCS (Edinburgh)
FRCS (Edinburgh)
M.Med (Singapore)
FAMS

Committed to Giving My Best for Every Patient.

This article has been medically reviewed by Dr. Tan Siong San
Dr Tan is a Senior Consultant Surgeon with over 25 years of clinical experience in the field of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery treating conditions affecting gallbladder, liver and pancreas.

"Personalised specialist care, tailored to the unique needs of every patient"

Get an Appointment!

Book a consultation with Dr. Tan Siong San at Mount Elizabeth Novena for personalised, timely surgical care in a comfortable and central location.





    LOCATION
    38 Irrawaddy Road, #09-58 Mount Elizabeth Novena Specialist Centre, Singapore 329563.
    OPENING HOURS
    Monday to Friday

    8.30am to 12.30pm,
    1.30pm to 5.30pm

    Saturday

    8.30am to 12.30pm

    Sunday & Public Holidays
    Closed

    Tan Siong San Surgery. © All Rights Reserved 2025

    cross